If we’re going to have 357 teams, the least we can ask is that they don’t all play the same way. On one end of the spectrum are ultra-conservative styles like the pack line, contrasted with far more aggressive up-the-line, pressure-heavy schemes on the other end. That’s a crucial (and comforting) point, though: even as the nationwide shift to more man-to-man becomes more pronounced a wide array of styles are still available under the man-to-man umbrella. Tony Bennett and Chris Beard (among many others) have recently experienced wild success with their own variations of man-to-man defenses, and it’s natural for others in the business to swipe elements from Bennett’s pack line and Beard’s no-middle approach. Hey, it worked out quite well for Baylor!įinally, coaching is often a copycat profession. Essentially calling coaches control freaks earlier wasn’t terribly kind, so here’s an effusive compliment: they’re incredibly smart, meaning it’s entirely conceivable that many of them saw the changes flowing through the game and opted to focus exclusively on man-to-man for that very reason. Obviously, the declining trend in zone usage started well before this season, so it may have been more of a “perception on where the game is going” decision, rather than a conclusion based on per possession data. But look how sharp the decline is in teams that used it more as a tactical adjustment: According to Synergy, in 2019-20, seven teams played some form of zone more than 75% of the time back in 2013-14, that number was six - nothing noteworthy there. That zone only saw the light of day one other time West Virginia in mid-February).ĭelving deeper into the numbers from the first graph shows that these “mix it up” defenses are where zone is dying. Of course, KU’s man-to-man defense was arguably the best in the country, so Bill Self rarely had to resort to such a curveball. Trying to disrupt the Flyers, the Jayhawks managed to get three stops in the second half, but two straight Jalen Crutcher corner triples via overloads quickly ended that dalliance. A standout example of this from this past season is Kansas mixing in a 2-3 wrinkle against Dayton’s juggernaut of an attack in Maui. The other reason most often cited for going zone is as a change of pace, giving the opponent something else to prepare for and/or to throw off an offense that has found a rhythm against man. So we know that, when fully committed to and done right, zone can work. Unsurprisingly, Syracuse has consistently ranked highly in defensive metrics, finishing inside KenPom’s top 20 in AdjDE in eight of the past 11 seasons. Syracuse is the obvious example: Jim Boeheim reels in high-caliber athletes, often with a massive center manning the paint (7’2 Pascal Chukwu comes to mind) his patented 2-3 zone is certainly not a “because we don’t have the players to go man-to-man” kind of default decision. I’m guilty of it in our 3MW season previews, sometimes wondering if a guard-heavy or athletically-limited squad should play primarily zone to compensate for such flaws.īut the best zones are the ones played by choice, rather than by necessity. Zone is often perceived as a crutch – how often do you hear something like, “Team X can’t match up with Team Y’s size, they should go zone,” “Team Z team lacks athletes, gotta go zone,” etc.? It’s offered as a Band-Aid, meant to cover up the wound of a glaring roster deficiency. Zone usage is tumbling nationwide, as the year-over-year trend line of “average time playing zone” continues to slope downwards: As it turns out, those teams are representative of a larger pattern throughout the sport of college basketball. Richmond, Baylor, USC, Wyoming, and Stanford saw massive benefits from a pivot to man-to-man, helping each program ascend the national rankings. That title has long belonged to college basketball, a sport with significantly wider gaps in talent and style thanks to the sheer volume of having 357 teams.Ī month and a half ago, I wrote about five teams that underwent a major shift in their defensive approaches in 2019-20 – and to great effect for each of them. However, for several reasons, the NBA is not the true “game of zones” in the basketball world (the elite skill level found in the professional ranks, league-specific rules prohibiting true zone alignments, etc.). The Bleacher Report series Game of Zones just wrapped up last week, tying a bow on the seven-season, NBA-themed parody of HBO’s epic (and ultimately controversial) show, Game of Thrones.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |